. How Safe is Weston Road? Whose Safety?

Fatima Nawaz (Criminology, Law, and Society // UT, Mississauga)



RESEARCH QUESTION
METHODOLOGY

This chapter explores official, lived, and spatial perceptions of safety along Weston Road. 

The domains of justice framework developed in Just Urban Design1 will be used to answer:

 
Whose safety is prioritized 
or excluded?

  1. A content analysis on official and unofficial media
  2. Interviews with residents, local neighbourhood community officers, and a Residents’ Association member. 
  3. Visualization using GIS and Adobe Illustrator to produce descriptive and counter-maps

MEDIA SOURCES: Toronto Police Services (TPS) open crime data, Global News, CP24 news articles, TikTok, Reddit, Facebook and YouTube comments
THEORY: Dana Cuff’s ‘thick mapping’ and Rebecca Solnit’s counter-mapping methodologies.



Shootings (2015-2024)
Assaults (2015-2024)
Robbery (2015-2024)
Homicide (2015-2024)
Bicycle Theft (2015-2024)
Break & Enter (2015-2024)
Theft from Motor Vehicle (2015-2024)
Theft Over $5000 (2015-2024)
Auto Thefts (2015-2024)
. Research Premise


Official media, such as Toronto Police Service (TPS) statistics and recent news, present Weston as a high-crime area.





. However, resident experiences of safety from unofficial media sources may reveal a gap because they counter stereotypical narratives of black male violence in official media.





. Procedural Justice

Who is involved, who is represented and who counts?

Finding #1: A gap between facts and perception.

Figure 1. Is Weston safe? 
The counter map presents a gap between official (left) and lived perceptions (right) of safety in Weston. Headlines from Global News and CP24 
are collaged on the right against statements made by residents of Weston taken from Reddit, Facebook and YouTube that suggest an opposing narrative.



News articles present narratives of Weston having a high crime rate due to frequent 
shootings, assaults, thefts, and robberies (Fig. 1). 
These occurrences often happen at the intersection of Weston Road and Lawrence Avenue West
highlighted by the yellow diamond in the countermap.


Church St. to Denison Rd. E, with Lawrence Ave. W


When combined with income demographics, the map shows a pattern of low-income residences surrounding a vulnerable crime hotspot (Fig. 2).
As a designated neighbourhood improvement area (NIA), official media sources further frame Weston as a socially violent and dangerous place to live and visit.2


Figure 2. Crime density and income level by dissemination area. 

The map shows areas in Weston characterized by income level and crime density.

Darker areas represent lower median household incomes. 

The size of the points represents the frequency of crimes and the colours classify the types of crimes. 

Areas around Lawrence Ave. W. and Weston Rd. have lower median household incomes and are characterized by higher frequencies of assaults.




For more on who lives on Weston Road



“I think these concerns about safety in Toronto are probably unduly influenced by the media or reputation.”
- Reddit
“ 
“These outsiders love to push a terrible narrative on minority areas.”
- Reddit
“Personally, I’d like to see Weston focus not only introducing exciting and interesting events but to also focus on the NEEDS of this community”

- Facebook

. Figure 3. Dollarama Solid Wall. Solid walls contribute to less eyes and greater perceived danger on the street


. Interactional Justice

Emphasizing the inclusion of underrepresented groups in built-form

Finding #2: The spatial features identified along Weston Road support residents’ lived experiences of safety.


. Figure 4. The spatial feature map identifies features that contribute to environmental safety or danger along Weston Road from Church Street to Dension Road West.

. Figure 5. A gaze map showing visibility on Weston Road. The red lines show transparency and the black lines show obstruction of vision


The spatial features map shows numerous streetlights, green spaces, and benches along Weston Road and Lawrence Avenue West (Fig. 4). 

These interventions support greater visibility (Fig. 5) and promote eyes on the street by allowing residents to gather. 

The same can be said about the parking lots that line Weston Road, as they improve safety during the day by providing informal gathering space. At night, however, they provide unmonitored spaces for loitering.




As a result, the spatial configuration of Weston Road suggests that greater attention is being paid to improving safety through environmental design, which is rooted in Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED) methodology.3 

CPTED was influenced by Oscar Newman’s ideas on territoriality, which he defined as establishing ownership 
and clearly defined uses of public space to “design out crime.”4

CPTED-informed design is seen along Weston Road, which may influence the differing perceptions 
of safety among the official media and residents’ experiences.





. Recognitional Justice

Acknowledges diverse users of public space

Finding #3: The gap between lived and official perceptions of safety calls into question: whose safety is excluded and included?
The Weston Residents Association conducts meetings regarding safety in the community. Its most recent meeting involved discussions of proposed environmental changes that align with CPTED interventions, such as a porchlight campaign to improve visibility at night.


. Meeting with a member of Weston Residents’ Association (right)
. Meeting with local NCOs Cherry Atkins (left) & Alexandru Benyi (left)
. Meeting with a resident of Weston

CPTED is criticized; however,

because its interventions often address crime as an environmental rather than a social problem. It has been established that a stronger focus on social programs and affordable housing is of greater need to residents (See Public Discourse & Statistics for more). 
As a result, the effectiveness of CPTED interventions on Weston Road may be limited. With growing public discourse around the eventual gentrification of the area, safety concerns from both residents and the official media will also be affected.

Gentrification will most likely increase perceptions of and overall safety in the area, but it will also likely increase social friction because of the transition of new populations to Weston.



BIBLIOGRAPHY
  1. Giamarino, Christopher, Goh, Kian, Loukaitou-Sideris Anastasia, and Mukhija, Vinit. “Just Urban Design Scholarship? Examining Urban Design Theories Through A Justice Lens.” In Just Urban Design: The Struggle for a Public City, edited by Kian Goh, Anastasia Loukaitou-Sideris, and Vinit Mukhija, 21-46. Massacushetts: The MIT Press, 2022.

  2. Eizadirad, Ardavan. “The University as a Neoliberal and Colonizing Institute: A Spatial Case Study Analysis of the Invisible Fence Between York University and the Jane and Finch Neighbourhood in the City of Toronto.” In Decolonial Pedagogy, edited by Njoki Nathani Wane and Kimberly L. Todd, 9-34. Switzerland: Palgrave Pivot Cham, 2018.

  3. Holman, Nancy, Mace, Alan, Zorloni, David, Navarrete-Hernandez, Pablo, Karlsson, Jacob, and Pani Erica. “Race-based readings of safety in public space in Milan, the challenge for urban design.” European Urban and Regional Studies 30, no. 3 (2022): 282-296.

  4. Holman, Nancy, Mace, Alan, Zorloni, David, Navarrete-Hernandez, Pablo, Karlsson, Jacob, and Pani Erica. “Race-based readings of safety in public space in Milan, the challenge for urban design.” European Urban and Regional Studies 30, no. 3 (2022): 282-296.






Reusers can distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only so long as attribution is given to the creator. 
If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms.